So... at what rate do convicted felons go Democratic... in predominantly Democratic twin cities?
Showing posts with label Minnesota. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Minnesota. Show all posts
"Felons Voting Illegally May Have Put Franken Over the Top in Minnesota, Study Finds."
At least 341 convicted felons voted, illegally, in Minneapolis-St. Paul, and Franken won by 312 votes.
So... at what rate do convicted felons go Democratic... in predominantly Democratic twin cities?
So... at what rate do convicted felons go Democratic... in predominantly Democratic twin cities?
Labels:
Al Franken,
Minnesota,
voting
"The right-wing reaction was predictable. Blogger Ann Althouse called it a 'dick move' and suggested a boycott of Minnesota."
MediaMatters makes a no-sense-of-humor move.
Boycott Minnesota? I'd never boycott Minnesota! I'd have to give up Bob Dylan. That won't happen. I wouldn't even boycott Prince... or the Coen Brothers. Really, politics just aren't that important to me. MediaMatters needs to get a life.
Boycott Minnesota? I'd never boycott Minnesota! I'd have to give up Bob Dylan. That won't happen. I wouldn't even boycott Prince... or the Coen Brothers. Really, politics just aren't that important to me. MediaMatters needs to get a life.
Labels:
Coen Brothers,
Dylan,
humorlessness,
Media Matters,
Minnesota,
Prince
Talk about an "arrogant bastard"!
Is it Bob Dylan... or Graeme Wood?
Wood quotes every jackass he can find in Hibbing, Minnesota and never even considers the theory that Dylan sings not like the townsfolk he heard talk but the singers he heard sing.
Wood quotes every jackass he can find in Hibbing, Minnesota and never even considers the theory that Dylan sings not like the townsfolk he heard talk but the singers he heard sing.
Labels:
Dylan,
Graeme Wood,
Minnesota
"An act of adultery between the defendant and the spouse of the plaintiff..."
"... when the defendant knew or should have known that the plaintiff’s spouse was married shall constitute proof of intentional interference with the plaintiff’s marriage. Damages awarded pursuant to this statute shall not exceed $500,000. This action shall be instituted within two years of the discovery of the adultery."
Maggie Gallagher is inspired by this proposed statute (from Minnesota, oddly enough). But what she really wants is not that you should be able to extract half a million dollars from the person who seduced your husband/wife. She wants a cause of action against websites that facilitate adultery.
Maggie Gallagher is inspired by this proposed statute (from Minnesota, oddly enough). But what she really wants is not that you should be able to extract half a million dollars from the person who seduced your husband/wife. She wants a cause of action against websites that facilitate adultery.
Labels:
adultery,
law,
lawsuits I hope will fail,
Maggie Gallagher,
Minnesota,
torts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)